|

Fig. 1.
The architecture of the proposed framework

Fig. 2. The workflow of the proposed
shot change detection method

(a)
(b)
 
(c)
(d)
Fig. 3. (a) a
sample frame from a goal shot (global view); (b) a sample frame
from the cheering shot following the goal shot for (a); (c)
object segmentation result for (a); (d) object segmentation
result for (b).

Fig. 4. The
histogram of the candidate grass values for a 20-minute long
soccer video. Two peaks correspond to two major types of
shooting scales in the video data ¡V global and close-up.

  
Fig. 5. Detected grass areas (black
areas) for 3 sample video frames from different types of shots.
  
(a)
(b)
(c)
  
(d)
(e)
(f)
Fig. 6. Goal shots followed by close
shots: (a)-(c) three consecutive shots in a goal event. (b) is
the close shot follows (a) the goal shot; (d)-(f) another goal
event and its three consecutive shots, (f) is the close shot
follows (d) the goal shot.

Fig. 7. Workflow
of mining goal shots in soccer video
|